Re: MIB reviewer comments on draft-ietf-ipcdn-device-mibv2-06.txt

Hi -

> From: "Woundy, Richard" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Randy Presuhn'" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 5:18 AM
> Subject: RE: [ipcdn] MIB reviewer comments on draft-ietf-ipcdn-device-mibv2-06.txt
...
> Those two MIB objects (docsDevFilterPolicyType, docsDevFilterPolicyAction)
> were defined in the original preparation of RFC 2669, but those MIB objects
> were commented out prior to RFC publication. The purpose of this object
> group is to identify those MIB objects so that the OIDs would not
> accidentally be reassigned.

This seems really bizarre.  If they were taken out prior to publication,
then those object identifiers were never really assigned.

> If there is a better approach for the draft to take, let me know.
...

I'm still trying to figure out what the real objective was.

Randy