RE: Re: Signaling MIB - Draft 3 - Last Call - pktcSigDevToneTable (Issue4)

"David De Reu" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipcdn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Status: closed.

Feedback from Motorola, which was supported by Broadcom, indicated that
I misinterpreted the specification:

> There is no need for any additional power objects for each frequency.
> The original comment submission is based on a misinterpretation of the
> specification. Here is how it works:
>
> The 300 001 specification states a RANGE of values for the frequency
> and power (i.e., x1=minimum level, x2=maximum level) that CPE
> (phones/fax/modems) should be able to accept as input from the various
> country/operator networks. The range explanation is in the text
> preceeding the Table 1.7.1 in 300 001. In reading an entry from the
> table, the frequency may be any value between f1 OR f2 but not both
> combined. For the power, the level will be in the RANGE that is stated
> regardless of the actual frequency being used. Thus, the single power
> level in the MIB is sufficient. This interpretation is further
> supported by supplement 2 to the ITU-T 181 specification which states:
> "f1//f2 in some exchanges frequency f1 is used and in others frequency
> f2 is used." Given the table 1.7.1 example for dial tone for Belgium,
> the correct interpretation is f1 (420 Hz would probably be 425 Hz +/-
> tolerance) or f2 (455 Hz would probably be 450 Hz +/- tolerance) at a
> SINGLE power level within the RANGE -20 dBm (p1) to -4 dBm (p2).

I fully agree with this, and apologize for any confusion I may have
caused.

Apart from this, I still have one question concerning the
pktcSigDevToneTable: can anyone please provide a usage example of
allFrequenciesModulated, since I could not find any myself (within the
ETSI specs at least - or is it specific for the US)? I am probably again
overlooking something.


Thanks,

David

_____________________________________________________
David De Reu
tComLabs
Stapelplein 70/004 - 9000 Ghent - Belgium
Tel: +32 9 269 22 91 - Fax: +32 9 329 31 74
www.tComLabs.com
_____________________________________________________
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.