Re: RE: Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10)
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001201c42183$59f0c440$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Keske Tom-LTK002" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:32 AM > Subject: [ipcdn] RE: Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) ... Thanks very much, Eduardo. I think that this > looks reasonable. There is a very minor spelling > error in a number of places, where it > has "dependant", and should say "dependent". > > < Persistence of read-create entries is implementation > < dependant. ... It's good to fix spelling errors, but having entry persistence implementation dependent cannot help foster interoperability. Randy