RE: RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - Clarification

Exactly that's the last Minnies, concern, if explicitely or not even
needed.
Thanks
Eduardo

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) -
Clarification


Hi -

> From: "Eduardo Cardona" <[email protected]>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - 
> Clarification
...
> Minnie's question if if need to be specify that rowstatus != active, 
> StorageType = nonVolatile the entry is deleted or if the RowStatus 
> aging covers that.
...

Ah.  Sorry about the confusion.
When an agent ages out a row that hasn't gone active
within the prescribed time, I believe it doesn't matter what the
StorageType was set to.  Of course, it doesn't hurt to be explicit.

Randy



_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn