RE: [Disman] WG last call on draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-01.txt

A comment,  

Eduardo
> We Will be ok with the disman group decision in this matter,
>
> </edo>
...

Ok, but we do appreciate ipcdn's input.  We need to be sure the end
result meets their needs.

<edo>
In my opinion Holes would be better, It minimizes objects maintenance
from the vender POV plus applications are developed (sub-setted) around
the minimal compliance. Although some read-only can be benefitial.

pingCtlType, pingCtlByPassRouteTable  read-only indicates
characteristics of how  function is implemented
pingMaxConcurrentRequests, pingCtlDataFill    can be removed  --implicit
or not required minimal compliance

Others in IPCDN group may have a different perception. Comments?
</edo>