Re: wg review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-03.txt
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001501c43a9f$1bc01240$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Nakanishi Greg-MGI8179" <[email protected]> > To: "'Eduardo Cardona'" <[email protected]>; "Raftus, David" <[email protected]>; "Ipcdn List (E-mail)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 2:52 PM > Subject: RE: [ipcdn] wg review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-03.txt ... > Let's wait to hear what the MIB doctors say about the object name. > I'm OK with changing the name, if that's the recommendation. ... I agree that there don't seem to be any advantages to retaining the old name. Current practice strongly favors referring to these things as notifications. Not only can RFC 3413 dynamically control whether these things show up on the wire as informs or traps, but there's also the possibility that they may end up being logged (locally or remotely) using, for example, RFC 3014. Randy