RE: Sig MIB, NCS SF Objects -1: CM or MTA config?

David wrote:
> Another pro is that this mechanism also works for a standalone MTA.
Good point, yes, I will add it to the list.

> Wouldn't it be nice if we were able to use the same MIBs for 
> both E-MTA and S-MTA?
Yes indeed but the QoS models for E-MTAs and S-MTAs are drastically
different. The E-MTAs being deployed today use CM/MTA initiated DQoS SFs
for voice media & static/dynamic SF for NCS. The S-MTAs are likely to
use a proxied QoS model following the PacketCable MM spec.

Jean-Francois.