RE: RE: Liaison from ETSI AT-Digital re. packet Cable MIBs

"David De Reu" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:46:52 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipcdn
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

MessageAgree with deletion of the pktcSigServiceClassNameUS,
pktcSigServiceClassNameDS, pktcSigServiceClassNameMask objects.

  Note: ETSI has also recommended the pktcSigNcsServiceFlowState object be
deleted. I don't recall a separate discussion regarding the
pktcSigNcsServiceFlowState object specifically on the reflector. Perhaps it
always intended to be associated with the SCN objects and the deletion
discussion. Comments?
Hi all,

The way I understand it, is that the pktcSigNcsServiceFlowState object is
indeed related to the pktcSigServiceClassNameUS, pktcSigServiceClassNameDS
and pktcSigServiceClassNameMask objects. So if you delete the latter
objects, you also have to delete the pktcSigNcsServiceFlowState object
because it doesn't seem useful on it's own.

Thanks,

David

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn