Re: [IPFIX] Any last comments on draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-07 ???
Nevil Brownlee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi again flow-selection authors: Reading Paul's comment again (below), do you agree with his suggestion about 'Informational?' If not, the draft really does need to specify at least some of the sampling methods ... Cheers again, Nevil On 6/09/11 11:08 PM, Paul Aitken wrote: > Dear all, > > Considering the draft some more... > > A standards track document should specify and contain everything that > needs to be known and understood in order to implement the specified > methods. > > However, this draft reads more as an overview of the methods, rather > than a specification of them. While reading it gave an idea of the > available methods, what actually needs done to correctly implement each > method is not spelled out. eg, there are only two MUSTs in the document, > both in the first paragraph of section 1. The average over all the IPFIX > drafts is over 15 MUSTs. > > In short, it seems more Informational than Standards track. > > P. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department | ITS Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix