Re: [IPFIX] multiple export streams
Benoit Claise <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul, As we discussed off line, that makes sense. Inserted in my temp version of RFC5101bis. Regards, Benoit. > Benoit, All, > > I just submitted a new errata for NFv9 (RFC 3954), to clarify that the > source port should be used to differentiate between multiple export > streams coming from a single device: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3954&eid=2979 > > > While doing this, I noticed another subtle difference between NFv9 and > IPFIX: > > 3954 says that these fields should be used to separate multiple > streams from the same Exporter: > > NetFlow Collectors SHOULD use the combination of the source IP > address and the Source ID field to separate different export > streams originatingfrom the same Exporter. > > (NB Exporter = "A device ... with the NetFlow services enabled".) > > Whereas 5101 limits to multiple streams from the same Exporting Process: > > Collecting Processes SHOULD use the Transport Session and the > Observation Domain ID field to separate different export streams > originatingfrom the same Exporting Process. > > - which fails to explain how to differentiate export streams from > multiple EPs in a single device. > > I think 5101 should also say, "from the same Exporter.", which in 5101 > is defined as: > A device that hosts one or more Exporting Processes is termed an Exporter. > > Can you take care of this in 5101bis? Shall I open another errata? > > Thanks, > P. _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix