Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00.txt
Danny Llewallyn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <29997431.1318332361054.JavaMail.root@elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net> |
Concerning these elements: 3.1.17. dateTimeMicroseconds The type "dateTimeMicroseconds" represents a time value in units of microseconds based on coordinated universal time (UTC). The choice of an epoch, for example, 00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970, is left to corresponding encoding specifications for this type, for example, the IPFIX protocol specification. Leap seconds are excluded. Note that transformation of values might be required between different encodings if different epoch values are used. 3.1.18. dateTimeNanoseconds The type "dateTimeNanoseconds" represents a time value in units of nanoseconds based on coordinated universal time (UTC). The choice of an epoch, for example, 00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970, is left to corresponding encoding specifications for this type, for example, the IPFIX protocol specification. Leap seconds are excluded. Note that transformation of values might be required between different encodings if different epoch values are used. I recently added support for these fields in the Lancope collector, and the format I assumed was NTP. Now I read here that these can come down in epoch time. Is there anything in the IPFIX protocol that denotes the format being used or the epoch time being used in these time values? I see also that the same Note exists at the end of each defined time element. Perhaps this could be solved with an options template. Thanks, Danny Llewallyn Lancope Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Benoit Claise Sent: Oct 10, 2011 7:52 AM To: "[email protected]" Subject: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00.txt Dear all, Here is new draft, for our new charter proposal: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00 The diffs with RFC5102 are at http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00.txt Your feedback is welcome. Regards, Benoit. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00.txt Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:00:52 -0700 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] A new version of I-D, draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Benoit Claise and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-claise-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis Revision: 00 Title: Information Model for IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Creation date: 2011-10-10 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 172 Abstract: This memo defines an information model for the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) protocol. It is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although developed for the IPFIX protocol, the model is defined in an open way that easily allows using it in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. This document obsoletes RFC 5102. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix