Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10

Juergen Quittek <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <CAE06438.27E19%[email protected]>
Hi Benoit,

On 09.11.11 17:03, "Benoit Claise" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Nevil, Juergen,
>    
>    From the agenda at
>    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/ipfix.txt, there is one
>    item missing in the "Current work items": Configuration Data Model
>    for IPFIX and PSAMP, draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10

That's OK, since there is nothing more to say about it than what
you write below.
    
>    This item is important as, if we look at the dependencies:
>    draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10, in the RFC-editor, has got
>    a MISSREF: draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib.
>    However, the latest draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib version has a
>    normative reference to draft-dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00.
>    So assuming that we agree on draft-dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00, which
>    introduces an IANA only change, I would like to propose that we
>    start the WGLC directly after the meeting, deblocking this way
>    draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10

Yes. This is indeed the best way of handling it. Changes in rfc5815bis
are minimal and we can go to WGLC immediately. Since the charter
has been approved, I'd suggest to post it as a WG draft as soon as
The submission opens on Monday Nov 14. Then we can start WGLC immediately
after the session. 

Thanks,

    Juergen


>    Regards, Benoit.
>    
>      
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>  
>
>_______________________________________________
>IPFIX mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.