Re: [IPFIX] RFC 5101bis: Changes to MTI transport protocol and security
Brian Trammell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Gerhard, Ah. I should have known that, sorry. Part of the argument for changing MTIs is the unimplementability of DTLS/SCTP, which Vermont would clearly seem to have disproven. So if we do this, we will have to find a way to do so that does not make existing implementations non-compliant. Thanks, cheers, Brian On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Gerhard Muenz wrote: > > Brian, > >>> What about implementations which already support DTLS/SCTP but not TLS/TCP? Will they become non-compliant? >> >> Essentially, yes. (Are there currently working DTLS/SCTP implementations which don't support TLS/TCP?) > > Vermont does not support TCP at all, but DTLS/SCTP on FreeBSD. > > Gerhard _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix