Re: [IPFIX] information model vs. information elements

Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 02:20:00PM +0200, Brian Trammell wrote:
 
> It might make sense to change the title, though; however, since the document is no longer the
> canonical reference for information elements for IPFIX, the proposed title isn't really right either. How about "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element Overview"?

Is it an overview? I do not think so. What about "Common IP Flow
Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements"? That's what I ended
up calling the YANG data types document.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.