Re: [IPFIX] enterprise ID 0
Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew, > As I understand the question we are only talking about the case where > the datatype and semantics are identical for IANA-IE and (IANA-IE & > 0x8000) and not some weird second IE space. That's a good point - there could be a second "parallel" IE space here. We could potentially use this in future if we ever get to 32k IANA elements. > I'm OK with Brian's suggestion of EP SHOULD NOT and CP MUST. I also > think it is worth stating explicitly. So we define equivalence between the two? > I'm pretty sure my CP will not currently accept IEs sent this way, > but that can be fixed easily enough. That's why I asked! :-) Thanks, P. _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix