Re: [IPFIX] IANA IPFIX as normative reference?
Benoit Claise <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear all, > Brian, > > +1. I'd like to do the same in IPFIX-config, which is currently in > AUTH48. Agreed. > > Does this assumption need chair / AD approval? Approved. Let's use the IANA's IPFIX registry, as a normative reference, from now on. Regards, Benoit (OPS AD hat on) > Thanks, > P. > >> hi Paul, all, >> >> if I get a say, I'd say "IANA" and "yes". This is the assumption >> presently made in ie-doctors and 5101bis/5102bis. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Brian >> >> On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:30 PM, Paul Aitken wrote: >> >>> Dear experts, >>> >>> Should new drafts / RFCs cite RFC5102 or IANA's IPFIX registry? >>> >>> Can the IANA registry be cited as a normative reference? >>> >>> (I recall the question being asked recently, though I don't recall a >>> definitive answer.) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gerhard and Paul >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IPFIX mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix