Re: [IPFIX] revising IPFIX IES 281 and 282
Andrew Feren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At the very least I would think the references should be in the references field. Probably applies equally to IEs: 46, 101, 208, 281, 282, 304, 361, 362, 368, 369 46, 208, 368, 369 puts the reference in the description and references. The others in the above list have references only in the description. All other IEs have any references in the references field. I also noticed that there is a mixed bag of links I can click on and text URLs that I need to copy and past. As for removing NAT64 from the description my initial reaction is that it is a good idea. -Andrew On 09/14/2012 03:29 PM, Paul Aitken wrote: > Dear experts, > > > I propose to request that IANA modify IEs 281 and 282 to remove > "NAT64" from their descriptions, to make them generic > post-NAT-IPv6-adddress fields per their names. > And also take the opportunity to update > "draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12" to RFC6146. > > ie, removing the text in *red* below, and adding the text in *green*. > > Perhaps we should add some other NAT RFCs, or entirely remove the last > sentence, "See ... for specification" ? > > Support? Feedback? Objections? > > Thanks, > P. > > > 281 postNATSourceIPv6Address ipv6Address current > > The definition of this Information Element is identical to > the definition of Information Element 'sourceIPv6Address', > except that > it reports a modified value caused by a *NAT64* middlebox > function after > the packet passed the Observation Point. > > See [RFC2460] for the definition of the Source Address field > in the IPv6 > header. See [RFC3234] for the definition of middleboxes. See > *http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12* > *RFC6146* for > nat64 specification. > > > 282 postNATDestinationIPv6Address ipv6Address current > > The definition of this Information Element is identical to > the definition of Information Element > 'destinationIPv6Address', except > that it reports a modified value caused by a *NAT64* > middlebox function > after the packet passed the Observation Point. > > See [RFC2460] for the definition of the Destination Address > field in the > IPv6 header. See [RFC3234] for the definition of > middleboxes. See > *http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12* > *RFC6146* for > nat64 specification. > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix