Re: [IPFIX] "ID" in Information Element names

Hi, Paul,

UUID is an established term too, no? So we should keep that as is.

Not sure about VRF.

I'd rename applicationId and natPoolId.

Cheers,

Brian

On Oct 23, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Paul Aitken <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've just been looking at how inconsistently "ID" and "Id" are used for IE names.
> 
> Since the bulk of the existing names are "...Id", can we assume that the following are all good:
> 
> vlanId
> postVlanId
> classificationEngineId
> commonPropertiesId
> observationPointId
> lineCardId
> portId
> meteringProcessId
> exportingProcessId
> templateId
> wlanChannelId
> flowId
> observationDomainId
> dot1qVlanId
> dot1qCustomerVlanId
> metroEvcId
> pseudoWireId
> postDot1qVlanId
> postDot1qCustomerVlanId
> exportSctpStreamId
> connectionTransactionId
> selectionSequenceId
> selectorId
> informationElementId
> virtualStationInterfaceId
> layer2SegmentId
> 
> 
> And that the following should change? :
> 
> applicationID -> applicationId
> natPoolID     -> natPoolId
> 
> 
> Finally, I'm not sure about the following:
> 
> wlanSSID           -> "SSID"seems to be an established term.
> ingressVRFID       -> should it be "VRFId" ?
> egressVRFID        -> should it be "VRFId" ?
> virtualStationUUID ->should it be "UUId" ?
> 
> 
> 
> Feedback?
> 
> Thanks,
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix