Re: [IPFIX] WGLC for draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-03

Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrew,

>>> 6.1.9  dateTimeMicroseconds
>>>
>>>     The data type dateTimeMicroseconds is a 64-bit field encoded
>>>     according to the NTP Timestamp format as defined in section 6 of
>>>     [RFC5905]. This field is made up of two unsigned 32-bit integers in
>>>     network byte order, Seconds and Fraction. The Seconds field is the
>>>     number of seconds since the NTP epoch, 1 January 1900 at 00:00 UTC.
>>>     The Fraction field is the fractional number of seconds in units of
>>>     1/(2^32) seconds (approximately 233 picoseconds). It can represent
>>>     dates beginning between 1 January 1900 and 8 February 2036.
>>
>> Since we're already over 80% through that range, it seems worth 
>> moving the epoch to 1/1/2000.
>>
>
> I don't disagree that this would have made sense, but can we 
> reasonably make this change in 5101bis?  Will this make a 5101 
> collector incorrectly interpret 5101bis?  Maybe I am missing something.

Correct; this is a point for discussion rather than a realistic 
proposal. Also, I'm glad to see you read this far through ;-)

Let's save this change for v11 export :-)

P.
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.