Re: [IPFIX] WGLC for draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-03
Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew, >>> 6.1.9 dateTimeMicroseconds >>> >>> The data type dateTimeMicroseconds is a 64-bit field encoded >>> according to the NTP Timestamp format as defined in section 6 of >>> [RFC5905]. This field is made up of two unsigned 32-bit integers in >>> network byte order, Seconds and Fraction. The Seconds field is the >>> number of seconds since the NTP epoch, 1 January 1900 at 00:00 UTC. >>> The Fraction field is the fractional number of seconds in units of >>> 1/(2^32) seconds (approximately 233 picoseconds). It can represent >>> dates beginning between 1 January 1900 and 8 February 2036. >> >> Since we're already over 80% through that range, it seems worth >> moving the epoch to 1/1/2000. >> > > I don't disagree that this would have made sense, but can we > reasonably make this change in 5101bis? Will this make a 5101 > collector incorrectly interpret 5101bis? Maybe I am missing something. Correct; this is a point for discussion rather than a realistic proposal. Also, I'm glad to see you read this far through ;-) Let's save this change for v11 export :-) P. _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix