Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-04.txt

Brian Trammell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi, Gerhard,

I recall reading them but _completely_ forgot to add them to the list of edits for -04; sorry about that! I'll include these along with other comments on -04 edits after the holidays in a -05.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian

On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Gerhard Muenz wrote:

> 
> Brian,
> 
> Have you read my WGLC comments?
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/current/msg06724.html
> I do not see them addressed.
> 
> The last sentence that you added to 9.2 does not make sense: If the CP needs to cache Data Records because it does not know the Template, this cannot be a Template ID reuse situation.
> 
> Regards,
> Gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> On 19.12.2012 10:48, Brian Trammell wrote:
>> Greetings, all,
>> 
>> Revision -04 of draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis addresses _most_ of the comments received during WGLC; many thanks to all who commented, as I think they've made the document much better.
>> 
>> The language on template withdrawals has changed significantly. The concept of a "template withdrawal message" has been largely removed from the document, and the section has been made consistent with 8.2. 8.2 has also changed quite a bit based on WGLC feedback. I don't think it's possible to come up with a solution to all the various little corner cases you can run into with template withdrawals that will make everyone happy (trivial proof: I'm not happy with any of the possibilities I've seen or could imagine), but I think what's in Section 8.1 is at least internally self-consistent, so please have a look.
>> 
>> Also completely new is Section 5.2 on timestamp wraparound, which describes epoch wrap on 1900 and 1970 epoch timestamps in a way that's consistent with what most people are probably already planning to do anyway; given V5 and V9, I suspect there's a lot of well-tested timestamp-wrapping corner-case code out there that can be easily adapted.
>> 
>> Please have a look at these and comment to the list; if only with a "works for me". Chairs, please let us know if this new revision requires a further WGLC.
>> 
>> Many thanks, and best regards,
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-04.txt
>>> Date: December 19, 2012 10:35:03 AM GMT+01:00
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the IP Flow Information Export Working Group of the IETF.
>>> 
>>> 	Title           : Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information
>>> 	Author(s)       : Benoit Claise
>>>                          Brian Trammell
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-04.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 66
>>> 	Date            : 2012-12-19
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
>>>   protocol that serves for transmitting Traffic Flow information over
>>>   the network.  In order to transmit Traffic Flow information from an
>>>   Exporting Process to an information Collecting Process, a common
>>>   representation of flow data and a standard means of communicating
>>>   them is required.  This document describes how the IPFIX Data and
>>>   Template Records are carried over a number of transport protocols
>>>   from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX Collecting Process.  This
>>>   document obsoletes RFC 5101.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis
>>> 
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-04
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-04
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPFIX mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPFIX mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>> 

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.