Re: [IPFIX] AD review for draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-08

Brian Trammell <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:31:26 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi, Benoit, Ron, all,

One reply inline; executive summary: expect a -09 soon addressing these concerns.

Cheers,

Brian

On 3 Jan 2013, at 16:41 , Benoit Claise wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Here is our AD review regarding draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-08
> 
> Regards, Ron and Benoit
> 
> 1.
> We see in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5102 "Updated by: 6313". What happens to this relationship?  In other words, what is the relationship with RFC 6313? Don't you have to say a few words about it?

I'd suggest adding new subsections of 3.1 for the abstract data types from 6313, referring (normatively) to 6313 for their definitions.

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix