Re: [IPFIX] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-13.txt
Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Benoit, > On 24/02/2013 17:40, Paul Aitken wrote: >> Benoit, Authors, >> >> Rather than defining a new "flowSelectorAlgorithm", shouldn't the >> proposed algorithms be added to the existing selectorAlgorithm #304? >> >> This only requires removing "packet" from the existing definition (or >> s/packet/packet and flow/), and allow that a Selection Process can be >> either a packet selection process or a flow selection process. > That would be nice, but I guess we would have to update all the PSAMP > RFCs. In particular, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5477#section-8.2.1 No, because we already decided that IANA's IPFIX registry is the master repository over the IPFIX RFCs - the registry can be updated, corrected, and extended, whereas the RFCs cannot. So the same must hold for the PSAMP RFCs. P. _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix