Re: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5655 (3560)

Hi,

This errata looks fine to me, but I want to hear from authors first, as 
this is the first time we will have a range of "0-0" in the IPFIX IANA 
registry.

Regards, Benoit
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5655,
> "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) File Format".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5655&eid=3560
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 8.2.11 + .18
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> (none)
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Range: The valid range is 0-0.
>
> Notes
> -----
> 8.2.11 messageScope requires a value of 0 ("The value of this Information Element MUST be written as 0") but no range is given. The range should say "0-0". (Compare with text in RFC 5102).
>
>
>
> Similarly for 8.2.18 sessionScope.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5655 (draft-ietf-ipfix-file-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) File Format
> Publication Date    : October 2009
> Author(s)           : B. Trammell, E. Boschi, L. Mark, T. Zseby, A. Wagner
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IP Flow Information Export
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix