Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT minutes for IPFIX meeting in Orlando

Nevil,

Two points inline, everything else snipped:


> + Mechanisms for moving Private Enterprise IEs into the IANA
>   IPFIX IE Registry, so that Collectors can recognise them
>   more easily.

My understanding is that this registry would be outside of IANA.

I strongly oppose pushing private enterprise information into a 
standards body's registry. They already maintain a perfectly good 
standards-based registry.


> These will be discussed further on the IPFIX list.

If we're considering new work items, please don't forget 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aitken-ipfix-unobserved-fields-01

It has expired simply because there's nothing new to be said. However, 
the work is desperately needed. Due to the lack of standardisation, 
cisco is already using several of these techniques to indicate 
unavailable and/or unobserved fields.


Thanks,
P.

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix