Re: [IPFIX] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt> (APPSDIR review)
S Moonesamy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6.2.5.6.2.20130410010433.0ca8b920__2109.28311939842$1365582969$gmane$org@elandnews.com> |
Hi Salvatore, At 00:38 10-04-2013, Salvatore D'Antonio wrote: >I did not adequately addressed your comment because I thought that the >guidelines specified in RFC 5226 were sufficient to deal with the issues >concerning the management of the sub-registry. Ok. >I would greatly appreciate if you could provide me with the reference to a >Draft where documentation and criteria for managing assignments are >specified so that I may use such Draft as an example. Section 4.1 of RFC 5226 points to Sections 6 and 7.2 in RFC 3748 as an example about Expert Review. Section 7.1 of RFC 5102 is another example. I suggest discussing the proposed change with the document shepherd or the Area Director to see whether it is appropriate. Regards, S. Moonesamy _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix