Re: [IPFIX] DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-17
Nevil Brownlee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Pete:
Following up on your 'compliance statement' issue (now that we've
established that it wasn't raised by an IPR question), I asked the
draft authors and the IPFIX list for opinions on this
From the replies to my posting to the list on this, the WG consensus
is that we do want to have c compliance statement. Therefore we
now want to replace the sentence in section 6.1 as follows:
OLD: In order to be compliant with this document, at least the
Property Match Filtering SHOULD be implemented.
NEW: In order to be compliant with IPFIX, at least one of
this document's flow filtering schemes MUST be implemented.
This would make it mirror the compliance statement in RFC 5475 (PSAMP
packet selection.
Would that be OK with you, please?
Cheers, Nevil
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland
FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix