[IPFIX] review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mediation-protocol-05
Paul Aitken <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here's a review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mediation-protocol-05. The comments are all editorial. > However, thanks to its Template mechanism, the IPFIX protocol can > export any type of information, as long as the relevant Information > Element is specified in the IPFIX Information Model > [I-D.ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis], registered with IANA, > or specified as an enterprise-specific Information Element. The > specifications in the IPFIX protocol > [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] have not been defined in the > context of an IPFIX Mediator receiving, aggregating, correlating, > anonymizing, etc... Flow Records fromthe one or multiple Exporters. Say, "from one or more Exporters". > IPFIX has a formal description of IPFIX Information Elements, their > name, type and additional semantic information, as specified in the > IPFIX Information Model > [I-D.ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis]. The IPFIX Information > Element registry [iana-ipfix-assignments]registry is maintained by Remove the second "registry". > Figure 3: Template Mapping example: templates > > The Template Mapping corresponding tofigure 3 is displayed infigure > 4: Capitalise "Figure 3" and "Figure 4" for consistency. Can you prevent the line break in "Figure 4" ? > Figure 4: Template Mapping example: mappings > > Alternatively, the Template Mapping may be optimized as infigure 5: Capitalise "Figure 5" for consistency. > 4.1.1. Template Mapping and Information Element Ordering > > In the situation where Original Exporters each export an (Options) > Template to a single IPFIX Mediator, and the (Options) Template > Record contains the same Information Elements but in different order, > should the IPFIX Mediator maintain a Template Mapping with a single > Export Template Record (seefigure 6) or should the IPFIX Mediator > maintain multiple independent Template Records (seefigure 7) before > re-exporting to the Collector? Capitalise "Figure 6" and "Figure 7" for consistency. > o Any combination or list of Information Elements representing > Observation Points. For example: > o Remove the additional bullet point. > Any combination of the above representations is possible. An example > of an Original Observation Point for an Intermediate Aggregation > Process is displayed infigure 8. Capitalise "Figure 8" for consistency. > The most generic way to export the Original Observation Point is to > use a subTemplateMultiList, with the semantic "exactlyOneOf". Taking > the previous example, the encoding infigure 9 can be used. Capitalise "Figure 9" for consistency. > Analogous to the Metering Process Reliability Statistics Options > Template, also specified in [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis], > Mediators SHOULD implement the Intermediate Process Reliability > Statistics Options Template, specified inthe Section 10.1. Remove "the". > 10.1. Intermediate Process Reliability Statistics Template Name this "... Option Template" since it contains scope IEs, and for consistency with 10.2. > 13. IANA Considerations > > This document specifies new IPFIX Information Elements, > originalExporterIPv4Address in Section 5.1, > originalExporterIPv6Address in Section 5.2, > originalObservationDomainId in Section 6.1, intermediateProcessId in > Section 10.3, and ignoredFlowRecordTotalCount in Section 10.4, to be > added to the IPFIX Information Element registry > [iana-ipfix-assignments]. [IANA NOTE: please add the five > Information Elements as specified in the references subsections, > change TBD1, TBD2, TBD3, TBD4, and TBD5 in this document to reflect > the assigned identifiers, put the Status as current, insert THISRFC > into theReuquester entry, insert 0 for the Revision, and use the > current date for Date.] Typo, "Requester". > Atsushi Kobayashi > NTT Information Sharing Platform Laboratories > 3-9-11 Midori-cho > Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180-8585 > Japan > > Phone: +81 422 59 3978 > Email: [email protected] Check whether this is still correct. P. _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix