Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London

Benoit,

>> I've presented these ideas in previous WG meetings, where the 
>> consensus was to wait for the next re-charter.
> Consensus, sure?

Yes: the work was interesting, but not relevant to the current charter. 
So, bring it up at the next recharter - which hasn't happened yet.


> I checked the meeting minutes and I don't see that.
> What I recall is that two different proposals were discussed 
> (draft-aitken-ipfix-equivalent-ies and draft-inacio-ipfix-penie-00), 
> with no clear winner.

Sure; each of these drafts has different merits. It would be up to the 
WG to decide on the best solution.

Look, here's a real problem in IPFIX which has resulted in not one but 
*two* different drafts trying to solve it in different ways. Do you 
propose to ignore it?

P.

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix