Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-01.txt

Hi Paul and Brian,

This works for me too.

FWIW I think worrying about this one tiny instance being English specific is way too little too late.  When we start translating the IE names, IE descriptions, data type names, data semantic names, etc. then we can worry about if boolean values need some internationalization.

-Andrew
________________________________________
From: IPFIX [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Aitken [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:32 PM
To: Brian Trammell
Cc: IPFIX Working Group
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for  draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-01.txt

Brian,

Aside from the fact that this is English-specific, it works for me.

P.


> Aside from the fact that these aren't case-insensitive (which at least causes an error as opposed to a non-detected incorrect acceptance), I'd say we could combine these:
>
> true = ('t' | 'T') 0*ALPHA
>
> false = ('f' | 'F') 0*ALPHA
>
> i.e., the decoder only looks at the first letter for [tT] or [fF], probably with a note that "true" and "false" are the preferred encodings.


_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix