Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities registry
Benoit Claise <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:25:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5420152C.2060501__5793.75689053467$1411388753$gmane$org@cisco.com> |
We could argue whether the semantic was actually changed since the EXP bits were used for QoS. Anyway, let's quote Jürgen: "The question is whether doing this is worth anything.". I'm not convinced... Regards, Benoit > Updating the description would be a problem if you change the semantics of > the object. > > David Harrington > [email protected] > +1-603-828-1401 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MIB-DOCTORS [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> t.petch >> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:50 AM >> To: Loa Andersson; Gregory Mirsky; [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; MIB Doctors (E-mail) >> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information >> Export (IPFIX) Entities registry >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loa Andersson" <[email protected]> >> To: "Gregory Mirsky" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> >> Cc: <[email protected]>; "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:28 AM >> >> Greg, >> >> I'm not sure about this - would changing the names require updating all >> existing deployed MIBs? >> >> <tp> >> >> Yes. See RFC2578 s.10. You cannot reuse an OID so this would need a new >> OID; messy, best left as one of those quaint, historic anomalies that >> litter our work. >> >> Updating the DESCRIPTION and REFERENCE is not a problem (but issuing >> any MIB module is a lot of work). >> >> Tom Petch >> [not a MIB doctor] >> >> >> >> >> Can we get an mib doctor advice on this? >> >> /Loa >> >> On 2014-09-10 21:22, Gregory Mirsky wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> in several places of describing MPLS Label element IEs the registry >>> still refers to the EXP field even though the RFC 5462 updated RFC >> 3032 >>> and renamed it "Traffic Class" (TC). Below is the list of IEs that may >>> benefit from updating Description and Reference information: >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection2 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection3 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection4 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection5 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection6 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection7 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection8 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection9 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection10 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelExp (should this be deprecated and mplsTopLabelTc be >>> created instead?) >>> >>> .postMplsTopLabelExp (should this be deprecated and postMplsTopLabelTc >>> be created instead?) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpls mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> >> -- >> >> >> Loa Andersson email: [email protected] >> Senior MPLS Expert [email protected] >> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > _______________________________________________ > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > . > _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix