Re: [IPFIX] Winding down the ipfix working group.
joel jaeggli <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:39:07 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/15/14 4:53 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > On 15/12/2014 11:57, Andrew Feren wrote: >> Are you talking about adding IEs or something more? >> IE's at least can be handled via expert review. if you needed new one's for a particular application that work might be best done in connection with the area of work requiring the IEs (as mibs or information models are). >> If more than just new IEs can you give an example? I've used IPFIX >> for transport of more than just network management information. I'm >> curious what is missing for your use cases. >> > > Well a bit off the cuff, but how about pre-registered templates rather > than refreshed templates so that IOT devices don't need to use energy > or bandwidth to transmit them? > > Are there any additional protocol considerations associated with > privacy, authentication and resilience when IPFIX is used over the > wide area? For example authenticated data merging? useful food for thought. thanks joel > - Stewart > > >> -Andrew >> >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> As many of you know I have concerns about closing IPFIX. >>> >>> Whilst IPFIX may have completed sufficient of its work in support >>> of network management, the protocol has much to offer in terms >>> of use as a mass data collection protocol particularly in the IOT space. >>> I thus have some reservations about terminating the work as >>> opposed to moving it to another area. >>> >>> - Stewart >>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: IPFIX [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of joel jaeggli >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:06 PM >>>>> To: IPFIX Working Group >>>>> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [IPFIX] Winding down the ipfix working group. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> The chairs and my co-AD and I have decided it's time to window >>>>> down the >>>>> ipfix working group. Our major milestones are completed and we >>>>> should be >>>>> pleased with the results. >>>>> >>>>> We have one remaining active document >>>>> >>>>> draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-variable-export >>>>> >>>>> which I will be happy to AD sponsor. Barring significant commentary to >>>>> contrary I will close the working-group on friday december 19th >>>>> and we will >>>>> retain the mailing list for some time after that. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and congratulations. >>>>> Joel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IPFIX mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > > -- > For corporate legal information go to: > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 221 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlSRJQwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKo2QCeP7lHc3I6dfVwW1B72XorbCO4 e+0AnRjBncHg9Tpza0oaF+lWe/o4SfD7 =Risc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----