Re: [IPFIX] Winding down the ipfix working group.

joel jaeggli <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:39:07 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/15/14 4:53 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> On 15/12/2014 11:57, Andrew Feren wrote:
>> Are you talking about adding IEs or something more?
>>
IE's at least can be handled via expert review. if you needed new one's
for a particular application that work might be best done in connection
with the area of work requiring the IEs (as mibs or information models are).
>> If more than just new IEs can you give an example?  I've used IPFIX
>> for transport of more than just network management information. I'm
>> curious what is missing for your use cases. 
>>
>
> Well a bit off the cuff, but how about pre-registered templates rather
> than refreshed templates so that IOT devices don't need to use energy
> or bandwidth to transmit them?
>
> Are there any additional protocol considerations associated with
> privacy, authentication and resilience when IPFIX is used over the
> wide area? For example authenticated data merging?
useful food for thought.

thanks
joel
> - Stewart
>
>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>> As many of you know I have concerns about closing IPFIX.
>>>
>>> Whilst IPFIX may have completed sufficient of its work in support
>>> of network management, the protocol has much to offer in terms
>>> of use as a mass data collection protocol particularly in the IOT space.
>>> I thus have some reservations about terminating the work as
>>> opposed to moving it to another area.
>>>
>>> - Stewart
>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: IPFIX [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of joel jaeggli
>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:06 PM
>>>>> To: IPFIX Working Group
>>>>> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: [IPFIX] Winding down the ipfix working group.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> The chairs and my co-AD and I have decided it's time to window
>>>>> down the
>>>>> ipfix working group. Our major milestones are completed and we
>>>>> should be
>>>>> pleased with the results.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have one remaining active document
>>>>>
>>>>> draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-variable-export
>>>>>
>>>>> which I will be happy to AD sponsor. Barring significant commentary to
>>>>> contrary I will close the working-group on friday december 19th
>>>>> and we will
>>>>> retain the mailing list for some time after that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and congratulations.
>>>>> Joel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPFIX mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>
>
> -- 
> For corporate legal information go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 221 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlSRJQwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKo2QCeP7lHc3I6dfVwW1B72XorbCO4
e+0AnRjBncHg9Tpza0oaF+lWe/o4SfD7
=Risc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----