Re: [IPFIX] review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-variable-export-07

Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:48:24 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0100, Paul Aitken wrote:
> Thanks for this Juergen. I'll produce an updated version for the editorial issues.
> 
> For the BITS issue, the largest IPFIX types are currently 64 bits (ie, signed64 / unsigned64). Although we could request a 128-bit type, we're simply moving the absolute limit along without solving the underlying issue.

SNMP encodes the bits into an octet string - an octetArray in
IPFIX. Could this be done here as well?
 
> Do you know what size the largest BITS object is today? Would it be
> acceptable to limit the size that can be exported in IPFIX to the
> first 64 or 128 bits?

The first question can't be answered so I can't answer the second. It
would be best, though, if IPFIX would not have to introduce a limit.
Would an octetArray not work?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix