Draft IPO minutes (IETF-55 Atlanta)

"Daniel O. Awduche" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:01:06 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipo
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C29796.9E3383E0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_000F_01C29796.9E3817C0"


------=_NextPart_001_000F_01C29796.9E3817C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Here's the draft minutes from the IPO WG meeting in Atlanta. 

Thanks to Dimitri Papadimitriou for taking  notes at the meeting 
from which the minutes were derived.

Regards,
/Dan
 

------=_NextPart_001_000F_01C29796.9E3817C0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.0.4630.0">
<TITLE>Draft IPO minutes (IETF-55 Atlanta)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Here's the draft minutes from the IPO WG meeting =
in Atlanta. </FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Thanks to Dimitri Papadimitriou for taking&nbsp; =
notes at the meeting </FONT>

<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">from which the minutes were derived.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Regards,</FONT>

<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">/Dan</FONT>

<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Arial" SIZE=3D2 COLOR=3D"#000000"> &lt;&lt;...&gt;&gt; =
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_000F_01C29796.9E3817C0--

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C29796.9E3383E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	name="ipo-atlanta-minutes.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="ipo-atlanta-minutes.txt"

IP over Optical WG (ipo) Meeting Minutes

Thursday, November 21 at 0900-1130
==================================

CHAIRS: James Luciani <[email protected]>
        Daniel Awduche <[email protected]>

AGENDA:

1) Working Group Status, Luciani, 5 mins

Presentation of the status of the working group efforts

2) Carrier Optical Services Requirements, 
   draft-ietf-ipo-carrier-requirements-04.txt, 
   Ananth Nagarayan, 15min

Summary:
- describe the carrier service requirement from an 
  itu-t/ason perspective
- brief history of the document
- fixing minor nits from version -03.txt 
- issues: not a lot of revision from the list thus
  expecting more input from the mailing list before 
  moving forward

3) GMPLS Signaling applicability, 
   draft-awduche-ipo-gmpls-signaling-applicability-00.txt, 
   Awduche, 20 mins

Summary:
- describe applicability statement for gmpls signalling
  which is included in the ipo charter
- two classes of applicability statements: 1) signalling 
  and 2) routing 
- focus is on rsvp-te and its gmpls capabilities.
  Benefits include 1) rapid provisioning 
  2) interoperability between different optical   
  sub-networks and between optical and IP domains
  3) flexibility (re-confiugration/modification of
  the parameter of the connection), and 
  (4) network survivability. 
- current draft is intented to become a wg document

Discussion:

- Dan Awduche: anybody see problems to progress this to 
  a working group document ? 

- Dimitri Papadimitriou: could the next version give
  more detail about the label set capability usage 
  for optical (meaning photonic) environements

- Dan Awduche: the next version will cover more on
  label set capabilities and other label-related
  parameters that apply to the IPO context

- Dan Awduche: who has read this document ? (show hands)

- note: only few people have read this document 

- Bert Wijnen: not too many people here have read
  the draft, first 10 to 20 people (with respect 
  to the meeting attendance) should have to read 
  it first before progressing this i-d 
  as a working group document 

- Dan Awduche: ask for feedback (through the IPO 
  mailing list) in order to progres this draft. 
  Lot's of good feedback have been received privatel
  though.

- Bert Wijnen: the working group must look for positive 
  statement and take them into account, we (as IETF) seek 
  for participation of the working group (among other
  through the mailing list) and not for private comments

- Dan Awduche: agrees with the statement of Bert

- Bert Wijnen: I restate, people must read the document 
  and have to post their feedback on the mailing list 
  and this is the only way to progress 

  Bert also mentions that seeing not a lot of people have
  read the document it is rather difficult to progress
  with it for the time being as a working group document

- Jim Luciani: suggest reaction on the mailing list 
  to make progress with this document

- Dan Awduche: encourages people to write the document 
  for the routing applicablity statements (since the 
  corresponding ccamp wg effort is nearly completed)

** end of the ipo wg meeting ** 
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C29796.9E3383E0--