Re: draft-awduche-ipo-gmpls-signaling-applicability-00.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:41:51 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks Dimitri,

Useful comments. We'll address them.

Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "Daniel Awduche" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [IP-Optical] draft-awduche-ipo-gmpls-signaling-applicability-00.txt


> adrian,
>
> i think some words on the use of the "acceptable label set"
> usage may help here, it is also related to specific crank
> back to the source case,
>
> i don't perceive the meaning of "signalling instability"
> and its relationship with constraint resource selection,
> in the following paragraph: "Additionally, this capability
> can be used to reduce connection setup latency and signaling
> instability in networks containing some classes of PXCs,"
> it is probably the combination of the words "signalling"
> and "instability" in the above sentence that makes its
> understanding difficult
>
> last, i think that in-line w/ the following statement:
> "- Signaling protocol transactions across trust domains: When GMPLS
>    signaling is required to traverse administrative domain
>    boundaries it may be necessary to take security issues into
>    considerations. These security implications across trust domains
>    are not adequately covered by the existing protocol machinery."
> either one goes into more details or one just remove
> it because as it stands there where are the issues
> wrt to the protocols ? in gmpls extensions or in its
> father protocols... and as such draw a conclusion
> becomes difficult
>
> thanks,
> - dimitri.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
> >
> > Daniel and I are about to start work on the next version of this draft and
would
> > very much appreciate your comments (favorable or otherwise) on the current
> > version.
> >
> > Please have a look at the current draft and let us know
> > - what we have done wrong
> > - what is missing
> > - whether you believe this draft serves a useful purpose.
> >
> > We would like to move the draft forward as a WG document if there is
sufficient
> > interest.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IP-Optical mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/ip-optical
>
> --
> Papadimitriou Dimitri
> E-mail : [email protected]
> Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
> E-mail : [email protected]
> Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
> Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
> Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361