Re: draft-awduche-ipo-gmpls-signaling-applicability-00.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:41:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Dimitri, Useful comments. We'll address them. Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; "Daniel Awduche" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [IP-Optical] draft-awduche-ipo-gmpls-signaling-applicability-00.txt > adrian, > > i think some words on the use of the "acceptable label set" > usage may help here, it is also related to specific crank > back to the source case, > > i don't perceive the meaning of "signalling instability" > and its relationship with constraint resource selection, > in the following paragraph: "Additionally, this capability > can be used to reduce connection setup latency and signaling > instability in networks containing some classes of PXCs," > it is probably the combination of the words "signalling" > and "instability" in the above sentence that makes its > understanding difficult > > last, i think that in-line w/ the following statement: > "- Signaling protocol transactions across trust domains: When GMPLS > signaling is required to traverse administrative domain > boundaries it may be necessary to take security issues into > considerations. These security implications across trust domains > are not adequately covered by the existing protocol machinery." > either one goes into more details or one just remove > it because as it stands there where are the issues > wrt to the protocols ? in gmpls extensions or in its > father protocols... and as such draw a conclusion > becomes difficult > > thanks, > - dimitri. > > > > > > > Adrian Farrel wrote: > > > > Daniel and I are about to start work on the next version of this draft and would > > very much appreciate your comments (favorable or otherwise) on the current > > version. > > > > Please have a look at the current draft and let us know > > - what we have done wrong > > - what is missing > > - whether you believe this draft serves a useful purpose. > > > > We would like to move the draft forward as a WG document if there is sufficient > > interest. > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IP-Optical mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/ip-optical > > -- > Papadimitriou Dimitri > E-mail : [email protected] > Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html > E-mail : [email protected] > Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/ > Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium > Phone : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361