RE: AD-review of draft-ietf-ipo-carrier-requirements

Alex,

I read this draft several months ago and I would agree with your
characterization of it.  As such, it doesn't seem to serve any particular
purpose.

Thanks,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Zinin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [IP-Optical] AD-review of draft-ietf-ipo-carrier-requirements
> 
> 
> Folks-
> 
>  After reading the document, I was left with the feeling that it is
>  not clear to me whether the document is simply a recompilation of the
>  material found in other organizations (such as OIF and ITU), or
>  something unique for the IETF. I asked several individual reviewers
>  to read the document and give me their opinions. All of them
>  mentioned similar concerns and indicated that the document should not
>  go forward.
> 
>  Before I can take the document to the IESG, I need to make sure it
>  represents wide consensus within the SUB-IP community and the WG in
>  particular. With this in mind, I would like to ask the WG chairs to
>  initiate another 2-week WG Last Call. I would also like the WG
>  participants to express their opinion on the document, and
>  specifically their support of the document going forward, and the
>  reasons why (if at all) they believe the document would be useful
>  with its current contents. Please make sure you've read the latest
>  version of the draft.
> 
>  Regards
> 
> -- 
> Alex Zinin
> IETF SUB-IP Area co-Director
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IP-Optical mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/ip-optical
>