Re: draft-ietf-ipoib-link-multicast-03.txt

Kanoj Sarcar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"H.K. Jerry Chu" wrote:
> 
> Kanoj,
> ...
> <snip>
> 
> >Of course, if the typical case is that join/attach will not fail
> >(ie the number of mcg's are not too great), we can probably punt
> >on this, but at least with a note that a limit on the number of
> >IP multicast groups exists depending on member hca's and fabric
> >(switch/SM) capability.
> 
> How about adding the following note to the draft regarding this
> vunerability?

Jerry,

Looks good, just one comment below. 

> 
> 11.0 New Vunerability in IB Multicast
> 
>    Many IB multicast functions are subject to new types of failure due
>    to resource constrains compared to Ethernet multicast. This includes
>    the creation of an IB multicast group, the join call, both the
>    "SendOnlyNonMember", the "FullMember", and the "NonMember" joins, and
>    the attaching of a QP to a multicast group.
> 
>    In general, these failure conditions are implementation dependent,
>    and are believed to be rare. Usually a failure can be propagated back
>    to a foreground operation to cause the operation to fail. But some IB
>    multicast functions are not tied to any foreground operation, making
>    their failures difficult to notice. E.g., if an IP multicast router
>    attempts to "NonMember" join a newly created multicast group in the
>    local subnet, but the join call fails, packet forwarding for that
>    particular multicast group will likely to fail silently without the
>    notice of local multicast senders. This type of problems add more
>    vulnerability to the already unreliable IP multicast operations.
> 
>    Implementations should log error messages upon any IB multicast
>    failure.  Network administrators should be aware of this
>    vulnerability, and preserve enough multicast resources if IP
>    multicast will be used heavily, or a certain degree of reliability is
>    expected.

How about somehow adding in verbiage like (this takes care of the most
likely cause of above mentioned failure): E.g, making sure the IP multicast 
router is using an HCA with ample IBA multicast resources.  

Thanks.

Kanoj

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jerry
> 
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Kanoj
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.