Re: draft-ietf-ipoib-link-multicast-03.txt
Kanoj Sarcar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"H.K. Jerry Chu" wrote: > > Kanoj, > ... > <snip> > > >Of course, if the typical case is that join/attach will not fail > >(ie the number of mcg's are not too great), we can probably punt > >on this, but at least with a note that a limit on the number of > >IP multicast groups exists depending on member hca's and fabric > >(switch/SM) capability. > > How about adding the following note to the draft regarding this > vunerability? Jerry, Looks good, just one comment below. > > 11.0 New Vunerability in IB Multicast > > Many IB multicast functions are subject to new types of failure due > to resource constrains compared to Ethernet multicast. This includes > the creation of an IB multicast group, the join call, both the > "SendOnlyNonMember", the "FullMember", and the "NonMember" joins, and > the attaching of a QP to a multicast group. > > In general, these failure conditions are implementation dependent, > and are believed to be rare. Usually a failure can be propagated back > to a foreground operation to cause the operation to fail. But some IB > multicast functions are not tied to any foreground operation, making > their failures difficult to notice. E.g., if an IP multicast router > attempts to "NonMember" join a newly created multicast group in the > local subnet, but the join call fails, packet forwarding for that > particular multicast group will likely to fail silently without the > notice of local multicast senders. This type of problems add more > vulnerability to the already unreliable IP multicast operations. > > Implementations should log error messages upon any IB multicast > failure. Network administrators should be aware of this > vulnerability, and preserve enough multicast resources if IP > multicast will be used heavily, or a certain degree of reliability is > expected. How about somehow adding in verbiage like (this takes care of the most likely cause of above mentioned failure): E.g, making sure the IP multicast router is using an HCA with ample IBA multicast resources. Thanks. Kanoj > > Thanks, > > Jerry > > > > >Thanks. > > > >Kanoj