Re: Multiple QPs for a single IPoIB Interface

Bill Strahm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Roy,

I do not see any reason that you could not create multiple QP for an IPoIB
link, infact I see that as a way of providing various SLA agreements.  That
said, I do not see any activity on standardizing how multiple QP would work
on an IB fabric, and our charter specifically limits QOS mapping until the
origional work is done (we are getting close)

If you have any specific uses of multiple QP, I would love to see an internet
draft discussing it, you can submit an individual submission, and when the WG
decides to take it on, move it to a working group submission (I guess I 
should say if, not when).

Bill
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:23:02PM -0400, Roy Brabson wrote:
> Are there any problems with using multiple QPs for a single IPoIB 
> "interface"?  I would like to use send queues for a single IPoIB "link", 
> and the only way I can think to do this is to use multiple QPs.  On 
> inbound, I would likely use one of the QPs for all traffic, although I 
> guess I could theoretically use a different QP by changing the QPN on the 
> ARP reply or Neighbor Advertisement.  The IPoIB specs talk about using a 
> single QPN for the IPoIB link, but I really can't think of any reason why 
> using multiple QPs wouldn't work.
> 
> Roy
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.