Re: Multiple QPs for a single IPoIB Interface
Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r01050300-1026-43CFC330858E11D79B5B003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]> |
On 5/13/03, Roy Brabson wrote: >Are there any problems with using multiple QPs for a >single IPoIB "interface"? I would like to use send queues >for a single IPoIB "link", and the only way I can think to >do this is to use multiple QPs. On inbound, I would >likely use one of the QPs for all traffic, although I >guess I could theoretically use a different QP by changing >the QPN on the ARP reply or Neighbor Advertisement. The >IPoIB specs talk about using a single QPN for the IPoIB >link, but I really can't think of any reason why using >multiple QPs wouldn't work. > Aren't you really asking about multiple Send Queues and a single Receive Queue for a "Queue Set"? The Queue Set would still look like a Queue Pair *to the outside world*. Does this feature require anything more than a custom local interface? Wouldn't it be wrong to consume QP IDs for the sending QPs when in fact you did not intend to receive upon them?