Re: Multiple QPs for a single IPoIB Interface

Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib
Message-ID <r01050300-1026-25BF4916858D11D79B5B003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]>
On 5/13/03, Roy Brabson wrote:

>Are there any problems with using multiple QPs for a
>single IPoIB "interface"?  I would like to use send queues
>for a single IPoIB "link", and the only way I can think to
>do this is to use multiple QPs.  On inbound, I would
>likely use one of the QPs for all traffic, although I
>guess I could theoretically use a different QP by changing
>the QPN on the ARP reply or Neighbor Advertisement.  The
>IPoIB specs talk about using a single QPN for the IPoIB
>link, but I really can't think of any reason why using
>multiple QPs wouldn't work.
>

Aren't you really asking about multiple Send Queues
and a single Receive Queue for a "Queue Set"?

The Queue Set would still look like a Queue Pair *to the
outside world*. Does this feature require anything more
than a custom local interface? Wouldn't it be wrong to
consume QP IDs for the sending QPs when in fact you
did not intend to receive upon them?

Caitlin Bestler
http://asomi.com/CaitlinBestler/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.