NITs comments on draft-ietf-ipoib-ibmib-tc-mib-03.txt

Hi -

Here are my ID-nits comments on
draft-ietf-ipoib-tv-mib-03.txt:

Ultra-trivial formatting:
   trailing blanks make line 88 too long (73 characters)
   trailing blanks make line 302 too long (76 characters)

"." at the end of a sentence is sometimes followed by
a single space, sometimes by two.  Should be two
consistently.  Strongly recommend fixing these before
going to RFC editor; any reformatting of DESCRIPTION texts
is best done by a document's author.

Serious:
Byte-order diagram for IpIpoibClientIdentifier doesn't
use network byte order.  Please take a look at
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt section 3.4 for
more details.

Minor:
RFC 2119 is referenced normatively, but is missing from
the list of normative references.

Acronyms should be expanded on first use.  Ones that
jumped out at me were:
 IBA
 LID  (though embedded in DLID)
 IEEE
 HCA
 TCA

Missing "." after the abbreviation "Vol."

The order of sections should be aligned with
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt section 4, i.e,
mib definitions (stays in current location)
acknowledgements (currently 9)
security considerations (currently 8)
Normative references (currently 6)
Informative references (currently 7)
Author's address (stays in current locations)

(My *personal* preference is to make the normative and
informative references sections sub-sections of a single
references section, but AFAIK that is merely a personal preference.)

Author's address has no country.

Randy