Re: IP over IB DHCP draft last call
Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:44:02 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib,gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503291142390.8487-100000@dyn319548.beaverton.ibm.com> |
Since I've not heard any comments on the attached subject I'm resubmitting the draft as per the suggested text. Vivek On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Vivek Kashyap wrote: > Thomas, > > By now 3315id has been submitted to IESG by dhc wg - that removes the concern > about referencing a draft that was still in the wg. Therefore I've no issues > with referencing 3315id. > > If there are no other objections or issues from the ipoib/dhc wgs, I'll > udpate the draft and resubmit. > > Vivek > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Thomas Narten wrote: > > > FWIW, and speaking as a regular WG member now, and having gone > > reviewed both draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-04.txt and > > draft-ietf-ipoib-dhcp-over-infiniband-09.txt, and having gone and > > reviewed some previous the threads on this topic... > > > > The current document says: > > > > According to [RFC2132] the "client-identifier" option may consist of > > any data that uniquely identifies the interface. Examples of > > suitable "client-identifier" values are the link-layer address, > > fully qualified domain name (FQDN) or, an EUI-64 value associated > > with the interface. > > > > In other words, any valid client-identifier can be used. > > > > I see no reason why the IB document needs to do anything different > > than just follow the recommendation in the 3315id. If there is any > > reason why some other variant should be allowed, I'd like to hear > > it. Leaving it up to the implementor to decide just creates confusion > > and unecessary variation that serves little purpose (at least as far > > as I can tell). Morever, the motivations for using a 3315id-style > > client-identifier are compelling. So, unless there is a good reason > > why IB can't use 3315-id, I'd suggest replacing the above paragraph > > with something like: > > > > > > When using DHCP over an Infiniband interface, a client-identifier > > as described in [draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-04.txt] MUST be used. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IPoverIB mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib > > > > > >