Re: IP over IB DHCP draft last call

Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib,gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503291142390.8487-100000@dyn319548.beaverton.ibm.com>
Since I've not heard any comments on the attached subject I'm resubmitting the
draft as per the suggested text.

Vivek

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Vivek Kashyap wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> By now 3315id has been submitted to IESG by dhc wg - that removes the concern 
> about referencing a draft that was still in the wg. Therefore I've no issues 
> with referencing 3315id. 
> 
> If there are no other objections or issues from the ipoib/dhc wgs,  I'll 
> udpate the draft and resubmit.
> 
> Vivek
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
> > FWIW, and speaking as a regular WG member now, and having gone
> > reviewed both draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-04.txt and
> > draft-ietf-ipoib-dhcp-over-infiniband-09.txt, and having gone and
> > reviewed some previous the threads on this topic...
> > 
> > The current document says:
> > 
> >     According to [RFC2132] the "client-identifier" option may consist of
> >     any data that uniquely identifies the interface. Examples of
> >     suitable "client-identifier" values are the link-layer address,
> >     fully qualified domain name (FQDN) or, an EUI-64 value associated
> >     with the interface.
> > 
> > In other words, any valid client-identifier can be used.
> > 
> > I see no reason why the IB document needs to do anything different
> > than just follow the recommendation in the 3315id. If there is any
> > reason why some other variant should be allowed, I'd like to hear
> > it. Leaving it up to the implementor to decide just creates confusion
> > and unecessary variation that serves little purpose (at least as far
> > as I can tell). Morever, the motivations for using a 3315id-style
> > client-identifier are compelling. So, unless there is a good reason
> > why IB can't use 3315-id, I'd suggest replacing the above paragraph
> > with something like:
> > 
> > 
> >    When using DHCP over an Infiniband interface, a client-identifier
> >    as described in [draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-04.txt] MUST be used.
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPoverIB mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
> > 
> > 
> 
>