RE: Please read - proposed WG termination

Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Yaron Haviv wrote:

> IB availability is defined today and one can migrate between ports and
> given the use of UD, can easily migrate between HCA either completely or
> relatively transparent to the network stack using the IB methods or the
> same IP address update using the same methods deployed today on all OS
> offerings.  In the end, it really is an implementation issue and fixing
> the OpenSM implementations not an IETF issue to resolve any
> deficiencies.
>
> Mike
>
> <Yaron>
>
> Mike, the solution that may work over IB is sending gratuitous ARPs
>
> This doesn't cover all the cases, e.g. how would VRRP or MAC faking work
> over IB ?
>
>
>
> By nature an IPoIB endpoint also contains QPs, so even theoretically an
> SM cannot deal with the problem
>

Am I right in assuming that you are suggesting LID + QPN + GID failover? 
LID is certainly beyond IPoIB. QPN + GID are in the ambit.

Vivek

> If we want to address interoperability between different vendors I
> believe we need to address it through standardization
>
>
>
> If you believe there is a solution that addresses my concerns and can be
> done in a standard/interoperable way please let me know
>
>
>
> Yaron
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> ] On
>> Behalf Of H.K. Jerry Chu
>> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:38 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: [Ipoverib] Please read - proposed WG termination
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> With the DHCP over IB draft in IESG's hand, we are done with all
>> the basic IPoIB work, including the architecture (informational),
>> encapsulation, and DHCP (standard tracked). Now seems a good time
>> to decide the next step for the WG.
>>
>> The work on IPoIB connected mode and most of the MIB drafts started
>> a while back (2003/2002). Over the years the interest/participation
>> level on these work has not been high, and now the work seems to drag
>> on indefinitely. The AD has recently questioned whether the remaining
>> work should be continued or not.
>>
>> The following is a quick update on their status:
>>
>> 1. IPoIB connected mode
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-connected-mode-00.txt
>> updated recently
>>
>> 2. MIB drafts
>> IPoIB Textual Conventions MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-ibmib-tc-mib-06.txt
>>
>> IPoIB InfiniBand Interfaces MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-ibif-mib-07.txt
>>
>> IPoIB subnet Management Agent MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-subnet-mgmt-agent-mib-07.txt
>>
>> IPoIB Channel Adapter MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-channel-adapter-mib-06.txt
>>
>> IPoIB Baseboard Management Agent MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-baseboard-mgmt-agent-mib-02.txt
>>
>> IPoIB performance Management Agent MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-perf-mgmt-agent-mib-03.txt
>>
>> The above 6 MIB drafts have gone through the
>> MIB doctor (Randy Presuhn) review late 2003 and
>> updated accordingly. All the updated drafts expired
>> in April 2005.
>>
>> 3. IPoIB Subnet Manager MIB
>> draft-ietf-ipoib-subnet-manager-mib-00.txt
>>
>> Submitted 3/2004 but has expired too.
>>
>> If you want to see any of the above work continue in the WG,
>> AND is willing to participate to get the work completed, please
>> speak up NOW! You will have until Sep. 20 to do so. After
>> that unless there is evidence a "sufficient" interest level
>> on any of the work above still exists, the WG will be disbanded
>> (or become dormant in order to handle the on-going work on
>> the standard-tracked RFCs) and the unfinished work abandoned.
>>
>> Note that authors of the above drafts may choose to resubmit
>> their drafts as individual submissions if they want to continue
>> to pursue their work at IETF.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Jerry & Bill
>>
>> IPoIB co-chairs
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPoverIB mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>
>