Re: FW: Please read - proposed WG termination

Hi folks,

OK, I got the point. We will post our observations early next week.
I guess we should provide a list of issues and not a full version of the mib docs.

I hope the group will not shut down.
However, if it does - can you point me to a web page describing how one would
send individual submissions? To whom? What format? etc...

Many thanks

Eitan


[email protected] wrote:
> Sean,
> 
> It is never too late.
> 
> As a matter of fact - why don't you repost the MIB documents.  We can
> either submit them as WG documents before we shutdown - or move them to
> have you submit them as individual submissions
> 
> Bill
> 
>>Eitan,
>>Please post your comments and issues and I will update the I-Ds for the
>>IPOIB MIBs.
>>
>>Jerry,
>>Is it too late to reissue the IPOIB MIB I-Ds? I could do it next week if
>>there is interest.
>>
>>/sean
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>Behalf Of H.K. Jerry Chu
>>Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 2:26 PM
>>To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
>>"Michael Kagan "@mellanox.co.il
>>Subject: Re: FW: [Ipoverib] Please read - proposed WG termination
>>
>>
>>>Hi IPoIB folks,
>>>
>>>My name is Eitan Zahavi and I work for Mellanox Technologies.
>>>As my responsibility is IB management software I would like to update
>>
>>the forum
>>
>>>Mellanox would be interested in contributing to the existing MIB
>>
>>drafts.
>>
>>>We already have several minor issues with the
>>>draft-ietf-ipoib-ibif-mib-07.txt and
>>
>>draft-ietf-ipoib-channel-adapter-mib-06.txt
>>
>>>What is not clear to me is how do we work with the forum on these
>>
>>issues?
>>
>>Just join the list (which you already did) and bring your
>>comments/issues
>>to the list before it's too late! (May already be too late though.)
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>IPoIB co-chair
>>
>>
>>>Please advice
>>>
>>>Eitan Zahavi
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: H.K. Jerry Chu [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:38 PM
>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>Subject: [Ipoverib] Please read - proposed WG termination
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>With the DHCP over IB draft in IESG's hand, we are done with all the
>>>>basic IPoIB work, including the architecture (informational),
>>>>encapsulation, and DHCP (standard tracked). Now seems a good time to
>>>>decide the next step for the WG.
>>>>
>>>>The work on IPoIB connected mode and most of the MIB drafts started a
>>>>while back (2003/2002). Over the years the interest/participation
>>
>>level
>>
>>>>on these work has not been high, and now the work seems to drag on
>>>>indefinitely. The AD has recently questioned whether the remaining
>>
>>work
>>
>>>>should be continued or not.
>>>>
>>>>The following is a quick update on their status:
>>>>
>>>>1. IPoIB connected mode
>>>>draft-ietf-ipoib-connected-mode-00.txt
>>>>updated recently
>>>>
>>>>2. MIB drafts
>>>>IPoIB Textual Conventions MIB draft-ietf-ipoib-ibmib-tc-mib-06.txt
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB InfiniBand Interfaces MIB draft-ietf-ipoib-ibif-mib-07.txt
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB subnet Management Agent MIB
>>>>draft-ietf-ipoib-subnet-mgmt-agent-mib-07.txt
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB Channel Adapter MIB draft-ietf-ipoib-channel-adapter-mib-06.txt
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB Baseboard Management Agent MIB
>>>>draft-ietf-ipoib-baseboard-mgmt-agent-mib-02.txt
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB performance Management Agent MIB
>>>>draft-ietf-ipoib-perf-mgmt-agent-mib-03.txt
>>>>
>>>>The above 6 MIB drafts have gone through the
>>>>MIB doctor (Randy Presuhn) review late 2003 and
>>>>updated accordingly. All the updated drafts expired
>>>>in April 2005.
>>>>
>>>>3. IPoIB Subnet Manager MIB
>>
>>draft-ietf-ipoib-subnet-manager-mib-00.txt
>>
>>>>Submitted 3/2004 but has expired too.
>>>>
>>>>If you want to see any of the above work continue in the WG, AND is
>>>>willing to participate to get the work completed, please speak up
>>
>>NOW!
>>
>>>>You will have until Sep. 20 to do so. After that unless there is
>>>>evidence a "sufficient" interest level on any of the work above still
>>>>exists, the WG will be disbanded (or become dormant in order to
>>
>>handle
>>
>>>>the on-going work on the standard-tracked RFCs) and the unfinished
>>
>>work
>>
>>>>abandoned.
>>>>
>>>>Note that authors of the above drafts may choose to resubmit their
>>>>drafts as individual submissions if they want to continue to pursue
>>>>their work at IETF.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you!
>>>>
>>>>Jerry & Bill
>>>>
>>>>IPoIB co-chairs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>IPoverIB mailing list
>>>>[email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>IPoverIB mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IPoverIB mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IPoverIB mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>>