RE: Ecosystems cost of additional specs (RE: Please read - proposed WG termination)

Let me get them read, and from there we can start a WG last call.

Randy,

If you still read this list - could you start with the -TC MIB and then
the ibif MIB.

Bill
> I have also just updated the 6 IP Over IB MIB I-Ds and they are now on
> the WG web page again. What needs to be done now to bring these to
> publication?
>
> /sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Vivek Kashyap
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:56 AM
> To: H.K. Jerry Chu
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Ecosystems cost of additional specs (RE: [Ipoverib] Please
> read - proposed WG termination)
>
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:
>
>> ...
>> <snip>
>>
>>> In any case, I think the debate has played itself out and the virtual
> hum
>>> says to proceed.
>>
>> Actually a similar debate and virtual hum already happened a couple of
>> years ago, before the proposal was accepted as a work item for the WG.
>
> There have been other, more recent, agreements/hums too. The connected
> mode
> draft became a working group draft late last year/early this year.
>
>> So the debate in the past couple of weeks, although interesting and
> may
>> even be educational for the late comers, is mostly moot.
>
> Wasn't the query whether the wg should continue and if there was
> interest
> in the specification? Why would that make the 'virtual hum' now moot?
>
>>
>> The decision facing the working group now is to either have enough
>> people committed to reviewing and producing a high quality standard,
>> or have the WG disbanded. We will have to decide soon.
>
> I thought the discussion over the last few days was answering the
> question
> of WG continuance.  In any case, I'm committed to continuing to work on
> the
> draft and bringing it to publication.
>
> Vivek
>
>
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>> So, I'll go quiet unless someone has a specific issue or
>>> wants to continue the debate for some other reason.  Mark me down as
> not
>>> supporting the hum which is likely just me in this regard.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPoverIB mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>