RE: IPoverIB Digest, Vol 16, Issue 25
Ali Ayoub <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:48:11 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --===============1645278970== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5BF5A.BE7CF7F0" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5BF5A.BE7CF7F0 Content-Type: text/plain ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: [email protected] Subject: [Ipoverib] MIB Compiler To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Ok - I have started reviewing the latest -TC MIB to push it into WG Last > call. > > However what I am missing is a MIB compiler to do syntax checking. If > anyone has a few MIB compilers ( I have gotten burned just using one ) > could you mstrip the textual convention ID and the Interface ID and run > the MIBs through your compilers ? > > If you could get back to me that you can do it, and when it can be done by > (end of the week ???) that would be great. > > Bill Compiled successfully using mib2c 5.2.1.2 BTW, the object IbIpoibClientIdentifier (MAC addr for IPOIB interface) seems to me reversed! it supposed to be QPN+GID (QPN in the first 3 LSBs) but in the TC MIB document it's GID+QPN. ------------------------------ ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5BF5A.BE7CF7F0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3DUS-ASCII"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2654.45"> <TITLE>RE: IPoverIB Digest, Vol 16, Issue 25</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT = SIZE=3D2>---------------------------------------------------------------= -------</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Message: 1</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT)</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: [Ipoverib] MIB Compiler</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Message-ID: = <[email protected]></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Ok - I have started reviewing the latest -TC = MIB to push it into WG Last</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> call.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> However what I am missing is a MIB compiler to = do syntax checking. If</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> anyone has a few MIB compilers ( I have gotten = burned just using one )</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> could you mstrip the textual convention ID and = the Interface ID and run</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the MIBs through your compilers ?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> If you could get back to me that you can do it, = and when it can be done by</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> (end of the week ???) that would be = great.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Bill</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Compiled successfully using mib2c 5.2.1.2</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>BTW, the object IbIpoibClientIdentifier (MAC addr = for IPOIB interface) seems to me reversed! it supposed to be QPN+GID = (QPN in the first 3 LSBs) but in the TC MIB document it's GID+QPN. = </FONT></P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>------------------------------</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5BF5A.BE7CF7F0-- --===============1645278970== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ IPoverIB mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib --===============1645278970==--