Re: IPOIB WG closing down

Hi Jari,

Jari Arkko wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
>> Is there a way that any additional IPoIB MIB standardization at the
>> IETF occur if this is done ? I thought there was sufficient interest
>> in at least the SM MIB to complete that work.
>>
>>
> Well, as far as I understand all the MIB documents are currently
> expired, and we are about four years behind the deadlines listed
> in the charter.
>
> It would be great of course if there was a pocket of energy somewhere
> to complete the MIBs. Is there?

I had made a start at dusting off the SM MIB. I believe completing this work
is important.
I also think there were others who expressed an interest in this particular
MIB.

> In any case, even after WGs close the
> ADs sometimes shepherd particular documents through the IESG.
> I'd be willing to do that for an IB-related MIB, if someone completed
> one.

That would be great. What would the process be ? How would comments be
solicited ?

>> Also, what is the status of IPoIB-CM ? Will this be moving forward
>> within the IETF process towards RFC ?
>>
>>
> It is approved, and currently in the RFC Editor's queue. Closing the
> group down does not affect this document's progress towards an RFC.

Thanks; I somehow missed that.

-- Hal

> --Jari
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib