Re: IPOIB WG closing down

Hi Jari,

Jari Arkko wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>> I had made a start at dusting off the SM MIB.
>>
> Great!
>
>>> In any case, even after WGs close the
>>> ADs sometimes shepherd particular documents through the IESG.
>>> I'd be willing to do that for an IB-related MIB, if someone
>>> completed one.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That would be great. What would the process be ? How would comments
>> be solicited ?
>>
>>
> First you have to get your MIB technical and documentation work
> completed. This probably means some hard work on your part, but
> feel free to get others to help you, and use this mailing list to
> solicit comments and reviews. I would suggest attempting to complete
> one document first, and then seeing if there is interest for doing
> some of the other ones.

I've revised the TC and the IB interface MIBs and submitted them to the
editor
per recommendation from Bill. I am currently working on the SM MIB but it is
a much
larger effort. I hope to have a version ready in the not too distant future.

We can see if there is interest in any of the other ones which also expired.

> At the time that you think you are ready, contact me and I will
> organize a MIB doctor review, do my own AD review, and if both of
> these come
> back as positive we are ready to go IETF Last Call and IESG review.
> The IETF Last Call notice is posted to the IETF announce list and but
> can copy it here just in case people missed it.

Thanks.

-- Hal

> --Jari
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib