Re: draft of a core protocol spec

On the current charter, we've set a re-charter
milestone of March 2003 to address extended features.
This does not stop the WG from discussing the
issues now. It's actually best to start thinking about
these extended features now to avoid long
delays/discussions when the time comes.

Albert

----- Original Message -----
From: "Helen Butcher" <[email protected]>
To: "albherre" <[email protected]>; "Leon Bruckman" <[email protected]>;
"'Frank Kastenholz'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [IPORPR] draft of a core protocol spec


> At 09:59 AM 11/7/2002 -0500, albherre wrote:
> >Leon,
> >
> >Just a suggestion after a quick read.
> >
> > > lb] We could at least define the mapping of DiffServe to the RPR service
> > > classes
> > >
> > > lb] We should at least specify the default mapping of DSCP into classes
> > >
> >
> >ah] I would suggest we leave Diffserv mappings out of the
> >core spec and address these when we re-charter for future work
> >as per the current charter.
>
> As a service provider company, we have interest to see how DiffServe
> will be supported by RPR. If it is put off to a future time, it would be
> helpful
> to indicate when it will be addressed.
>
> Thanks,
> Helen.
>