RE: [RPRWG] RE: payload length and padding and stuff
Nader Vijeh <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:09:49 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.iporpr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan, Thank you for the correction. Jumbo frames are not supported by the 802.3 standard. There are Ethernet switches on the market that support jumbo frames in a proprietary manner. Of course these will not interoperate with standard compliant 802.1 bridges. As I pointed out in the rest of the message, even if jumbo frames are supported, max frame size "needs to be configurable to be lower, in order to comply with transparent bridging requirements". Nader -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:45 AM To: Nader Vijeh; Necdet Uzun; Anoop Ghanwani Cc: Frank Kastenholz; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff > > The max frame size may be extended beyond 802.3 1522 bytes > limit as there is > precedence in 802.3 community. Nader, I am not sure what you exactly mean. If you refer to what is popularly known as 'Jumbo frames', they are not supported by the IEEE 802.3 standards. Dan