Re: RFC: Bring back S/MIME support for IPP Encrypted Jobs and Documents?
Ira McDonald via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN40gSsRSd-aHjtBaDaQzy8JL7-G++C7tXa4MEriUQP9iJFwvA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Mike and Smith, Excellent - I'll add this to IPP WG agenda for tomorrow - will send agenda this afternoon. Cheers, - Ira *Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)* *Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF* *Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG* *Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG* *Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic <http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc <http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434* On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:31 AM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, thanks for finding this! I’m sure that enterprises would prefer using > S/MIME. We should definitely review this and work to restore S/MIME in > TRUSTNOONE if we believe it is appropriate. > > Cheers, > Smith > --- > Smith Kennedy > [email protected] > > > On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:28 AM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > Somehow we missed this, but the IETF published an update to S/MIME in > April of 2019: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8551 > > Among other things, this update addresses the EFAIL cryptographic > vulnerability in S/MIME by adding support for some new cipher suites with > Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) instead of the old (insecure) Cipher Block > Chaining (CBC) mode. > > Using S/MIME bring the advantage that it shares most of the infrastructure > that is already in place for TLS, particularly when it comes to trusting a > third party. PGP depends on the "web of trust" for this and may not be as > attractive to some. > > Thoughts? > > ________________________ > Michael Sweet > > > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp