Re: RFC: Bring back S/MIME support for IPP Encrypted Jobs and Documents?

Ira McDonald via ipp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID <CAN40gSsRSd-aHjtBaDaQzy8JL7-G++C7tXa4MEriUQP9iJFwvA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Mike and Smith,

Excellent - I'll add this to IPP WG agenda for tomorrow - will send agenda
this afternoon.

Cheers,
- Ira
*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected]
<[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:31 AM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)
via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wow, thanks for finding this! I’m sure that enterprises would prefer using
> S/MIME. We should definitely review this and work to restore S/MIME in
> TRUSTNOONE if we believe it is appropriate.
>
> Cheers,
> Smith
> ---
> Smith Kennedy
> [email protected]
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:28 AM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  All,
>
> Somehow we missed this, but the IETF published an update to S/MIME in
> April of 2019:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8551
>
> Among other things, this update addresses the EFAIL cryptographic
> vulnerability in S/MIME by adding support for some new cipher suites with
> Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) instead of the old (insecure) Cipher Block
> Chaining (CBC) mode.
>
> Using S/MIME bring the advantage that it shares most of the infrastructure
> that is already in place for TLS, particularly when it comes to trusting a
> third party. PGP depends on the "web of trust" for this and may not be as
> attractive to some.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.